A Blind Student’s Outdoor Science Learning Experience: Barrier Hunting at METU Science and Technology Museum
 
More details
Hide details
1
Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Mustafa Sahin Bülbül   

Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
Publish date: 2017-10-10
 
International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education 2014;6(2):100–109
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is about how to adapt the science centers to blind students. For this purpose a barrier hunting methodology is used. This methodology includes seven steps such as selecting the group and place, recording the barriers during the visit and evaluating the recorded barriers. According to the barrier hunting with a blind student at METU Science and Technology Museum, barriers are categorized in six dimensions; access barriers to the area, access barriers to the material, access barriers to the information, safety barriers around the area, safety barriers around the material, and validity problems about the information. These dimensions also present suggestions about how to make the METU Science and Technology Museum more visit friendly.
 
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88(S1), S17-S33.
 
2.
Anderson, D., Lucas, K.B., Ginns, I.S. & Dierking, L.D. (2000). Development of knowledge about electricity and magnetism during a visit to a science museum and related post‐visit activities. Science Education, 84(5), 658-679.
 
3.
Baxter, P. & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.
 
4.
Buyurgan, S. (2009). The Expectations of the Blind University Students from Museums. Educational Sciences Theory Practice, 9(3), 1191-1204.
 
5.
Buyurgan, S. & Demirdelen, H. (2009). Total Kör Bir Öğrencinin Öğrenmesinde Dokunma, Đsitsel Bilgilendirme, Hissetme ve Müze. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(3), 563-580. (in Turkish)
 
6.
Bülbül, M.S., & Eryılmaz, A. (2012). Görme engelli öğrenciler için fizik ders araçları. Ankara: Murat Kitapevi. Retrieved from http://books.google.com.tr/boo... jhpX6lzgicC&hl=tr&source=gbs_navlinks_s. (in Turkish)
 
7.
Bülbül, M.S. (2013a). Towards inclusive nature of science (iNOS) activities. Đnternational Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(1), 173–179. Retrieved from http://www.ijonte.org/FileUplo...
 
8.
Bülbül, M.S. (2013b). A description of a blind student’s science process skills through health physics. European J of Physics Education, 4(2), 6–13. Retrieved from http://ejpe.erciyes.edu.tr/ind...
 
9.
Özel, C. (2013). Müzede Engel Avı. In Claire's Home Page . Retrieved Sep 30, 2013, from http://claireozel.wordpress.co.... (in Turkish)
 
10.
Falk, J.H. & Needham, M.D. (2011). Measuring the impact of a science center on its community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 1-12.
 
11.
Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing New Access to the General Curriculum Universal Design for Learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8-17.
 
12.
Jacob, B.P. (2012). Rich Environments for Active Learning (Real) and Science Learning in Nigeria. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, January Special Issue, 3-12.
 
13.
Laçin Simsek, C. (2011). Okul dısı öğrenme ortamları ve fen eğitimi. (Ed: Laçin-Simsek, C.), Fen Öğretiminde Okul Dısı Öğrenme Ortamları (1. Baskı.), (s. 1-23). Ankara: PegemA. (in Turkish)
 
14.
Pisha, B. & Coyne, P. (2001). Smart From the Start The Promise of Universal Design for Learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 197-203.
 
15.
Rennie, L.J. & Williams, G.F. (2002). Science centers and scientific literacy: Promoting a relationship with science. Science Education, 86(5), 706-726.
 
16.
Silver, P., Bourke, A. & Strehorn, K.C. (1998). Universal Instructional Design in higher education: An approach for inclusion. Equity & Excellence, 31(2), 47-51.
 
17.
Scott, S.S., Mcguire, J.M. & Shaw, S.F. (2003). Universal Design for Instruction A New Paradigm for Adult Instruction in Postsecondary Education. Remedial and Special Education, 24(6), 369-379.
 
18.
Sentürk, E. & Özdemir, Ö.F. (2012). The Effect of Science Centres on Students’ Attitudes towards Science. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, (ahead-of-print), 1-24.
 
19.
Quarcoo-Nelson, R., Buabeng, I. & Osafo, D.G.K. (2012). Impact of Audio-Visual Aids on Senior High School Students’ Achievement in Physics. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 4(1), 46-54.
 
eISSN:1306-3049