An Investigation into The Achievement of Junior Secondary School Students Taught Integrated Science Using the Cooperative Learning Strategy in Nigeria
 
More details
Hide details
1
Federal College of Education, Yola, Adamawa State, NIGERIA
2
Dept. of Curriculum and Teaching, University of Swaziland, SWAZILAND
3
Dept. of Science Education, Adamawa State University, Mubi, Adamawa State, NIGERIA
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Olufunlayo Ikedolapo Oloyede   

Dept. of Curriculum and Teaching, University of Swaziland, SWAZILAND
Publish date: 2017-10-10
 
International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education 2015;7(2):63–73
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The Instructional strategy is an important variable that affect students’ achievement in science in the classroom setting. The search for the effective strategies that would empower learners to exhibit improved science achievement is the purpose of this work. This study investigated the effect of cooperative learning strategy on the junior secondary school students’ achievement in Integrated Science in Adamawa State. Pre-test, Post-test quasi experimental research design was employed for variable matching. The population was made of all JSS III Students in Adamawa State Secondary Schools in 2011 academic session. The sample consists of 256 JSSIII Students made up of 84 Students in E1 Lecture Method group, 70 Students in E2 Cooperative Learning Strategy group alone and 72 in E3 Cooperative Learning Strategy and Lecture Method group. The treatment groups where randomly selected among selected participating schools intact classes were also randomly selected from the schools where there is more than one arm of JSSIII. Intact teachers known as research assistants after being trained by the researchers administered the treatment in order to remove teacher bias. The instruments used for Data Collection were a 50 items Integrated Science Achievement Test (ISAT). The reliability value of ISAT is 0.71. The instrument was administered before treatment (Pre-test) and after the treatment (Post-test). The data were analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). Multiple Classification Analysis (MCA) was also used to detect the magnitude of Significant Variations. The results showed that: (i) There was a Significant main effect of treatment on achievement (F (2,207) = 740.95, P<.05). Results show that all the treatment groups benefitted from the treatment. The Lecture group benefitted the least followed by the Cooperative Teaching Strategy group alone; the Lecture Method combine d with Cooperative Learning Strategy group benefitted the most. These findings have implications for the Classroom teacher, students, curriculum designers, text book writers and publishers. In line with these findings it was recommended that Cooperative Learning Strategy, together with Lecture could serve as a viable alternative to the Conventional Lecture Method particularly in the teaching of Integrated Science to Secondary School Students.
 
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Adeyemi, S.B.(2002).Relative effects of Cooperative Learning and Individualized Learning Strategies on Students declarative and Procedural Knowledge in Map Work in Osun State, Unpublished PhD Thesis University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
 
2.
Aghyeneka, E. U. (2003). The Nature of Science Education in Nigeria Today, Kusagu Journal 1(1), 43 – 48.
 
3.
Ajaegbuna, H.I.(2009).The challenges of teaching to Geographers and geography Teachers in Nigeria. A paper presented at the High School geography Conference at University of Ibadan.
 
4.
Borsch, F. Jurgen - Lohmann, J., & Giesen H. (2003). Achievement through Cooperative Learning. Jigsaw in German elementary Schools. Retrieved 14th May 2011 from http://www.unifrankfort.ed/fbo....
 
5.
Clarkson, D. B. & Sampson, V. (2008) Assessing Dialogic argumentation in On-line Environment to relate structure, ground, and Quality. Journal of research in Science teaching 45 (3), 6.
 
6.
Cooper, S. S. (2010) Effect of Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning on students’ achievement in science clan. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: 19(5), 351-356.
 
7.
Demide, C.O. (2011) Effect of Previous Knowledge on Students Cognition, Comprehension and achievement in Some Content Areas in Chemistry. Unpublished Ph.D thesis,Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi.
 
8.
Dumas, A. (2003), Cooperative learning: A response to diversity. Retrieved March, 16, 2012 from http://www.cole.ca.gw/iasa/coo....
 
9.
Eilks,T.(2002).Learning at Stations in Secondary Level Chemistry Lesson Science Education International 3(1), 11 – 18.
 
10.
Federal Government of Nigeria (2004) National Policy on Education. NERDC Press Lagos.
 
11.
Federal Government of Nigeria (2011). National Policy on Science and Technology. NERDC Press Lagos-Lagos.
 
12.
Ghaith G. (2009). Learners’ perceptions of their STAD Cooperative experience system 29, (10), 289-301.
 
13.
Idowu, C. B. (2011). Students’ performance in the environmental aspect of integrated science. A case study of Oyo State College of Education, Oyo. Journal of Science Technology and Mathematics 1(1), 50-57.
 
14.
Iroegbu, T. O. (2002). Problem-based learning numerical ability and gender as determinants of achievement, problem solving, and line graphing skills in senior secondary Physics in Ibadan. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
 
15.
Johnson, D. W. & Ahlergren, A. (1976). Relationship between student attitudes about Cooperative and Competition and attitude toward Schooling. Journal of Educational Psychology 68(1), 92 – 102.
 
16.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN: International Book Company.
 
17.
Kolawole, E. B. (2007). Effects of Competitive and Cooperative learning strategies on Academic performance of Nigeria students in mathematics. Educational Research Review 3(1), 33-37.
 
18.
Nwagbo, C. R. (2006). Effects of Two Teaching Methods on the achievement and attitude to Biology of Students of Different Levels of Scientific literacy. International Journal of Educational Research 45 (2), 216 – 229.
 
19.
Nwoji, Q. J. R. (2000). Improving the teaching and Learning of Introductory Technology through the use of Media. In Akale, A.M. G.(Ed), 41st Annual Conference Proceedings of STAN on enriching Science Technology and Mathematics education, 402-405. Ibadan Heinemann.
 
20.
Ogunkola, B. J. (2002). Instructor – Expressiveness, Student’s locus of control and Cognitive entry behaviour as determinants of Students achievement in and attitude towards Biology. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan. Ibadan. 65-69.
 
21.
Ogunsola Bandele, M. F. & Osisioma, I. (2007). Preparing for the 21st Century Classroom-moving. Towards the Use of Cyber space as a Technology - Based Information Source. Proceeding of NARST (2009) Annual Conference Graden Groove Carlifornia.
 
22.
Okebukola, P. A. O. (2002). Introduction. In Adeyegbe, S. 0, Akpan, B.B, Adenuga, I. J, Pele, S.F, Umar, B and Okebukola P. A. O. Catch up Chemistry for SSCE and UME. Heinemann Educational Books Ibadan Nigeria.
 
23.
Okoronka, A. U. (2004). Model based instruction, Cognitive style, and quantitative ability as determinant of students learning outcomes in secondary school physics in Lagos state. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis. University of Ibadan. Ibadan.
 
24.
Okoronka, A. U. &, Ogunsola – Bandele, M. F.. (2008). Making the teaching and learning of Wave concepts fun using Analogical model. Science Teacher Association ofNigeria. Proceeding of the 49th Annual Conference 2008.
 
25.
Oloyede, O. I. (2008). The Effect of Enhanced Feedback strategy on Integrated Science Achievement. The Jos Journal of Education. 3, 17 - 18.
 
26.
Oloyede, O. I. (2009). A Meta – Analysis of the Effect of Advanced Organisers on Acknowledgement and Retention of SSS Chemistry. International Journal of Educational Sciences. 2. 1 -5.
 
27.
Oloyede, O. I. 7 Adeoye, F.(2009). Comparative Effect of the Guided Discovery and Concept Mapping Strategies on SSS Chemistry Achievement in Nigeria. Eurassian Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education. 1 (2) 86 – 92 http://www.Eurassianjournals.c....
 
28.
Oloyede, O. I. & Ogunsola `Femi (2011). The Relative Effects of Model – Based Instructional Strategies on Nigerian Attitude Towards Chemistry. JOLORN 13, (2) 23 – 27.
 
29.
Oloyede, O. I. & Omole, C. O.(2013). Effect of Previous Knowledge On Students Cognition Some Content Areas in Chemistry. Eurasians Journal of Physics & Chemistry. 5 (1) 71 79.
 
30.
Onyia, C. R. Osisioma, I. U Ogunbandele. M. (2009). Capturing Urban middle School students voice on the use of science inquiry in their classroom. Proceedings of NARST 2009 Annual conference Garden Groove California.
 
31.
Orankotan, A. F. (2004). Meta-cognitive Instructional Strategies of framing and rehearsals on students’ learning outcome in secondary school Genetics. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan. Ibadan.
 
32.
Oyekan, S. O. (1993). Diagnosis of Students Weakness.: A Conceptual Framework for Remediation of Underachievement in Science. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria 28(1), 82 – 90.
 
33.
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s Theory. In PH Mussen (Ed.) Carmichael’s Manual of child’s Psychology (3rd Ed.) 1. New York Wiley.
 
34.
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on Cooperative learning and achievement: what we know, what we need to know. Retrieved September, 26, 2011 from http://www successful.com/resource/Resear... 1 – 20.
 
35.
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction Based on Cooperative Learning. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds) handbook of Research on learning and instruction. New York: Taylors Francis.
 
36.
Smith, P. (2007) A review of Science in Secondary Schools in England. Teaching Science 22(3), 123-124.
 
37.
Stahl, R. (2003). From “Academic strangers” to successful members of a cooperative learning group: An inside the learners Perspective. In cooperative learning in the social studies classroom: An invitation to social study-Washington. D.C. National Council for the social studies.
 
38.
Stanne, M. E. (2000). Effects of Small group learning on Undergraduate in Science, Mathematics, Engineering,and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. National Institute for Science Education: Madison, Wi, http://www.wier.wisc.edu/nise/... cllresourc/Rzhtm. (Accessed May 26, 2011).
 
39.
Trans, V. D. & Lewis, R. (2012) the effect of cooperative learning on students at Giang University in Vietnam. Internal Education Studies 5(1), 86-99.
 
40.
Tsai, C. C. (2000). Enhancing science instruction: The use of conflict maps. International Journal of Science Education 22 (3), 285-302.
 
41.
Von, S. C. (2002). Effects of Inquiry based Teacher Practices on Sciences Excellence and Equity. Journal of Educational Research 69(1), 24-30.
 
42.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. In Cole, M. John-Steiner, V. Scribner, S aSouberman, E (eds) Cambridge, M.A: Harvard University press.
 
43.
Wyk, M. (2010) The effect of Students Team Achievement Division (STAD) on achievement, retention, and attitudes of Economic education Students, University of Free State, South Africa 2010 EABR ERLC Conference proceedings, Dublin Ireland.
 
eISSN:1306-3049