Chemistry Teachers’ Misconceptions Concerning Concept of Chemical Reaction Rate
Ali Kolomuç 1
Seher Tekin 2  
More details
Hide details
Faculty of Education, Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin, Turkey
Faculty of Education, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey
Publish date: 2017-10-12
International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education 2011;3(2):84–101
Teachers play a great role in how students understand and learn the concepts taught in class. Studies show that teachers reflect their already-existing conceptual constructs and their problem-solving processes onto students. This is also true of the misconceptions reflected in chemistry classes, especially when absract concepts are being taught. It is the purpose of this study to see the degree of understanding of chemistry teachers concerning the chemical reaction rate concept. A case study method was used in the study whose sample consisted of 70 chemistry teachers from 40 different cities in Turkey. The data were collected through a chemical reaction rate comprehension test comprising 5 open-ended questions. The results have indicated that teachers have some misconceptions concerning chemical reaction rate.
Seher Tekin   
Faculty of Education, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey
1. Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., Renner, J. & Marek, E.A. (1992). Understandings and misunderstandings of eight graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105-120.
2. Abraham, M.R., Williamson, V.M. & Westbrook, S.L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147-165.
3. Akkaya, C.G. (2003). Comparison of teaching the relation rate course using the traditional and the experimental training methods on students success in lycee 2 classes. Unpublished Master Thesis, Marmara University, Turkey.
4. Ayas, A., Özmen, H. & Coştu, B. (2002). The Determination of the secondary school students’understandings about evaporation concept. Dokuz Eylül University Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 14, 74-84.
5. Balcı, C. (2006). Conceptual change text oriented instruction to facilitate conceptual change in rate of reaction concepts. Unpublished Master Thesis, METU, Turkey.
6. Bar, V. & Travis, A. (1991). Children's views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 363-382.
7. Bilgin, İ. (2006). Promoting pre-service elementary students’ understanding of chemical equilibrium through discussions in small groups. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 467-484.
8. Bozkoyun, Y. (2004). Facilitating conceptual change in learning rate of reaction concepts. Unpublished Master Thesis, METU, Ankara.
9. Brooks, J.G. & Brooks, M.G. (1999). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria.
10. Camacho, M. & Good, R. (1989). Problem solving and chemical equilibrium: successful vs. unsuccessful performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(3), 251-272.
11. Coştu, B. (2007). Comparison of students’ performance on algorithmic, conceptual and graphical chemistry gas problems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(5), 379-386.
12. Çakmakçı, G. (2005). A cross-sectional study of the understanding of chemical kinetics among Turkish secondary and undergraduate student. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Leeds, UK.
13. Çakmakçı, G, Donnelly J. & Leach, J. (2005). A cross-sectional study of the understanding of the relationships between concentration and reaction rate among Turkish secondary and undergraduate students. In: Boersma K, de Jong O, Eijkelhof H, Goedhart M (eds) Research and the quality of science education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 483-497.
14. Çakmakçı, G., Leach, J. & Donnelly, J. (2006). Students’ ideas about reaction rate and its relationship with concentration or pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1795–1815.
15. Çakmakçı, G. (2010). Identifying alternative conceptions of chemical kinetics among secondary school and undergraduate students in Turkey. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(4), 449-455.
16. Çalık, M., Ayas, A. & Coll, R.K. (2007). Enhancing pre-service primaryteachers’ conceptual understanding of solution chemistry with conceptual change text. International Journal of Science Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1-28.
17. Çalık, M., Kolomuç, A. & Karagölge, Z. (2010). The effect of conceptual change pedagogy on students’ conceptions of rate of reaction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5), 422-433.
18. Çepni, S. (2003). Araştırma ve Proje Çalışmalarına Giriş. Erol Ofset, Trabzon. (In Turkish).
19. Duit, R. & Treagust, D.F. (1995). “Students’ conceptions and constructivist Teaching approaches” in Improving Science Education. Edited by Barry J. Fraser & Herbert J. Walberg, pp. 46-69. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
20. Duit, R. (2009). STCSE – Bibliography: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Kiel, Germany: IPN – Leibniz Institute for Science Education, , retrieved date: 16.09.2010.
21. Ebenezer, J.V. & Erickson, L.G. (1996). Chemistry students’ conception of solubility: A phenomenograpy. Science Education, 80(2), 181-201.
22. Fensham, P.J. (1992). Science and Technology. In PW Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum, pp. 789–829, NewYork: Macmillan.
23. Gabel, D.L., Samuel, K.V. & Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(8), 695–697.
24. Garnett, P.J. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry. Electric circuits and oxidation reduction equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 121-142.
25. Gussarsky, E. & Gorodetsky, M. (1988). On the chemical equilibrium concept: constrained word associations and conception. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(5), 319-333.
26. Hackling, M.W. & Garnett, P.J. (1985). Misconceptions of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 205-214.
27. Haidar, H.A. & Abraham, R.M. (1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concept based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 919-938.
28. Halim, L. & Meerah., S. (2002). Science trainee teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 215-225.
29. Hesse, J.J. & Anderson, C.W. (1992). Students' conceptions of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3), 277-299.
30. Hines, C. (1990). Students’ understanding of chemical equations in secondary school in Botswana. School Science Review, 72(258), 138-140.
31. Johnstone, A.H. (1991).Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75-83.
32. Kolomuç, A. (2009). Animation aided instruction on “rate of chemical reactions” unit in grade 11 in regard to 5E model. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Atatürk University, Turkey.
33. Kozma, R.B. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205-226.
34. Kwen, B.H. (2005). Teachers’ misconceptions of biological science concepts as revealed in science examination papers. AARE 2005 International Education Research Conference,, retrieved date: 26.11.2010.
35. Lin, J.W. & Chiu, M.H. (2007). Exploring characteristics and diverse sources of students' mental models in acids and bases. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 771-803.
36. Matthews, M.R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 121-134.
37. MNE - Ministry of National Education- (2008). The Programme of Secondary School Chemistry (11th grade), Turkey.
38. Nakipoğlu C., Benlikaya R. & Kalın S. (2002). Usage of V-diagrams in eliciting pre-service chemistry teachers’ misunderstanding of chemical kinetic., retrieved date: 19.11.2010.
39. Osborne, R. & Cosgrove, M. (1983). Students' conceptions of the changes of states of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825-838.
40. Özmen, H. (2007). The effectiveness of conceptual change texts in remediating high school students’ alternative conceptions concerning chemical equilibrium. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(3), 413-425.
41. Özmen, H., Demircioğlu, H. & Demircioğlu, G. (2009). The effects of conceptual change texts accompanied with animations on overcoming 11th grade students’alternative conceptions of chemical bonding. Computers & Education, 52(3), 681-695.
42. Pardhan, H. & Bano, Y. (2001). Science teachers' alternate conceptions about direct-currents. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 301-318.
43. Pardo, J.Q. & Solaz-Patolez, J.J. (1995). Students’ and teachers’ misapplication of Le Chatelier’s principle: implications for teaching of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), 939-957.
44. Ross, B. & Munby, H. (1991). Concept mapping and misconceptions: a study of high school students’ understandings of acids and bases. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 11-23.
45. Schmidt, H.J. (1995). Applying the concept of conjugation to the Bronsted theory of acidbase reactions by senior high school students from Germany. International Journal of Science Education, 17(6), 733-742.
46. Staver, J.R. & Lumpe, A.T. (1995). Two investigations of students understanding of the mole concept and its use in problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(2), 177-193.
47. Taber, K.S. & Tan, K.C.D. (2011). The ınsidious nature of 'hard-core' alternative conceptions: implications for the constructivist research programme of patterns in high school students' and pre-service teachers' thinking about ionisation energy. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 259-297.
48. Taştan Kırık, Ö., Yalçınkaya, E. & Boz, Y. (2010). Pre-service chemistry teachers’ ideas about reaction mechanism. Journal of Turkısh Scıence Educatıon, 7(1), 47-60.
49. Taştan Kırık, Ö. & Boz, Y. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning on students’understanding of reaction rate. XIV. Symposium of the International Organization for Science and Technology Education (IOSTE), Bled, Slovenia, 13-18 June., retrieved date: 07.02.2011.
50. Tezcan, H. & Yılmaz, U. (2003). The effect of conceptual computer animations and traditional instruction in teaching chemistry on student achievement. Pamukkale University Journal of Faculty Education, 14(2), 18-32.
51. Van Driel, J.H. (2002). Students’ corpuscular conceptions in the context of chemical equilibrium and chemical kinetics. Chemistry Education Research & Practice in Europe, 3(2), 201-213.
52. Vermette, P., Foote, C., Bird, C., Mesibov, D., Harris-Ewing, S. & Battaglia, C. (2001). Understanding constructivism(s): a primer for parents and school board members. Education, 122(1), 87-93.
53. Voska, K.W. & Heikkinen, H.W. (2000). Identification and analysis of student conceptions used to solve chemical equilibrium problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 160-176.
54. Yarroch, W.L. (1985). Students’ understanding of chemical equation balancing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 449-459.