Turkish Adaptation of the Views of Nature of Science-Form C: Validity and Reliability Study
More details
Hide details
Aksaray University
Gazi University
Online publish date: 2018-06-07
Publish date: 2018-06-07
International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education 2018;10(1):41–49
Background The aim of this study is to adapt the nature of science questionnaire C form to Turkish in a valid and reliable manner. The questionnaire was developed by Abd-El Khalick (1998) and further amendments on the questionnaire were made by Lederman, Abd-El-Khalick, Bell, and Schwartz (2002). Material and methods The process of adaptation of the questionnaire was carried out in five steps. These are: translating from English to Turkish, back translation from Turkish into English, the implementation of both Turkish and English versions with preservice science teachers, carrying out the pilot research and then the actual research. Results The items 1 and 4, 6, 7, and 8 after validity and reliability study were revisited and each question was separated into two and indicated as a and b (e.g. 1-a and 1-b). The questionnaire is frequently used in the nature of science research and it was previously adapted to German, Portuguese, Thai, Swedish, Vietnamese and Korean. Conclusions It is hoped that the Turkish adaptation will contribute to the studies in nature of science in Turkey.
Hasan Özcan   
Aksaray University, Eğitim Fakültesi, MFBE Bölümü, Fen Bilgisi Eğitimi AD, 68100 Aksaray, Turkey
1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). The influence of history of science courses on students’ conceptions of the nature of science. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Oregon State University, Oregon.
2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science education, 82(4), 417-436.
3. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000a). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.
4. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000b). The influence of history of science courses on students’views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095.
5. Aikenhead, G. S., Fleming, R. W., & Ryan, A. G. (1987). High‐school graduates' beliefs about science‐technology‐society. I. methods and issues in monitoring student views. Science Education, 71(2), 145-161.
6. Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2007). Bilimin doğasının sınıf öğretmeni adaylarına kütle çekim konusu içerisinde farklı yaklaşımlarla öğretilmesine yönelik bir çalışma (A study toward teaching the nature of science based on different approaches for classroom teachers in gravity content). Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Karadeniz Teknik University, Institute of Natural Sciences, Trabzon.
7. Azevedo, N. H. (2017). A large-scale survey on nature of science conceptions of the brazilian biology undergraduates and the potentially associated education factors. Brazilian Journal of Research in Science Education, 19.
8. Bartos, S. A. (2013). Teachers' knowledge structures for nature of science and scientific inquiry and their classroom practice, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology.
9. Behling, O., & Law, K. S. (2000). Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: Problems and solutions, 133, Sage.
10. Belo, N. A. H. (2013). Engaging students in the study of physics: an investigation of physics teachers’ belief systems about teaching and learning physics, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Leiden University.
11. Billeh, V. Y., & Hasan, O. E. (1975). Factors affecting teachers' gain in understanding the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 12(3), 209-219.
12. Buaraphan, K. (2011). Pre-Service Physics Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science. Online Submission, 8(2), 137-148.
13. Buckland, L. A. (2015). Exploring an expanded conception of epistemic cognition, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University-Graduate School-New Brunswick.
14. Burniston, A. (2017). The effects of case-based instruction on undergraduate biology students’ understanding of the nature of science. Doctoral dissertations and projects. 1471. http://digitalcommons.liberty.....
15. Chen, S. (2006). Views on science and education (VOSE) questionnaire. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(2). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.
16. Chen, S., Chang, W. H., Lieu, S. C., Kao, H. L., Huang, M. T., & Lin, S. F. (2013). Development of an empirically based questionnaire to investigate young students' ideas about nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(4), 408-430.
17. Cooley, W. W., & Klopfer, L. E. (1961). TOUS: Test on understanding science. Educational Testing Service.
18. Cotham, J. C., & Smith, E. L. (1981). Development and validation of the conceptions of scientific theories test. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(5), 387-396.
19. Çil, E. (2010). Bilimin doğasının kavramsal değişim pedagojisi ve doğrudan yansıtıcı yaklaşım ile öğretilmesi: ışık ünitesi örneği (Teaching of the nature of science in conceptual change pedagogy and explicit reflective approach: A case study for ‘Light unit’). Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Karadeniz Teknik University, Institute of Natural Sciences, Trabzon.
20. Doğan Bora, N. (2005). Türkiye genelinde ortaöğretim fen branşı öğretmen ve öğrencilerinin bilimin doğası üzerine görüşlerinin araştırılması (Investigating science teachers' and high school students' views on the nature of science in Turkey). Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
21. El Khoury, R., Boujaoude, S., & El Hage, F. (2014). Exploratory study of the epistemological points of view of university science teachers. Case of a Faculty of Science Lebanese and Francophone. Spiral-E Journal of Educational Research, 53 (1), 41-65.
22. Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science‐related attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509-515.
23. Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological assessment, 6(4), 304.
24. Hacıeminoğlu, E., Yılmaz-Tüzün, Ö., & Ertepınar, H. (2014). Development and validation of nature of science instrument for elementary school students. Education 3-13, 42(3), 258-283.
25. Halloun, I., & Hestenes, D. (1998). Interpreting VASS dimensions and profiles. Science & Education, 7(6), 553–577.
26. Hansen, J. L. C. (1987). Cross-cultural research on vocational interests. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 19(4), 163-176.
27. Hillis, S. R. (1975). The development of an instrument to determine student views of the tentativeness of science. In Research and Curriculum Development in Science Education: Science Teacher Behavior and Student Affective and Cognitive Learning, (Vol. 3), Austin, TX: University of Texas Press).
28. Hofheinz, V. (2008). Developing an understanding of the nature of science: a case study exploring the potential of implicit approaches in open learning situations using chemistry teaching as an example, Doctor of Pedagogy, University of Siegen.
29. Hungerford, H. & Walding, H. (1974). The modification of elementary methods students’ concepts concerning science and scientists. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Science Teachers Association.
30. Khishfe, R. (2008). The development of seventh graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 470-496.
31. Kim, S. Y., & Nehm, R. H. (2011). A cross‐cultural comparison of korean and american science teachers’ views of evolution and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 197-227.
32. Kimball, M. E. (1967). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5(2), 110-120).
33. Koksal, M. S., & Cakiroglu, J. (2010). Development of nature of science scale (NSS) for advanced science students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(2), 87-98.
34. Küçük, M. (2006). Bilimin doğasını ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerine öğretmeye yönelik bir çalışma (A study toward teaching the nature of science for seventh grade primary students). Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Karadeniz Teknik University, Institute of Natural Sciences, Trabzon.
35. Leden, L. (2017). Black & white or shades of grey: teachers’ perspectives on the role of nature of science in compulsory school science teaching. Malmö University, Faculty of Education and Society, Malmö Studies in Educational Sciences No. 78.
36. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
37. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: past, present, and future. In Abell, S. K. and Lederman, N. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831-879). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Lederman, N. G., & O’Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74, 225–239.
39. Lederman, J. S., & Khishfe, R. (2002). Views of nature of science, Form D. Unpublished paper. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.
40. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L. and Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-512.
41. Lederman, J. S., & Ko, E. (2004). Views of scientific inquiry, Form E. Unpublished paper. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.
42. Lederman, N. G., Schwartz, R. S., Abd-El-Khalick, F. and Bell, R. L. (2001). Preservice teachers’ understanding and teaching of the nature of science: an intervention study. The Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(2), 135-160.
43. Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). The development, use, and interpretation of nature of science assessments. In International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 971-997). Springer Netherlands.
44. Liang, L. L., Chen, S., Chen, X., Kaya, O. N., Adams, A. D., Macklin, M., & Ebenezer, J. (2006). Student Understanding of Science and Scientific Inquiry (SUSSI): revision and further validation of an assessment instrument. In Annual Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Francisco, CA (April) (Vol. 122).
45. Korth, W. W. (1969). Test Every Senior Project: Understanding the Social Aspects of Science.
46. McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P. and Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 3-39). Kluwer (Springer) Academic Publishers.
47. Özcan, H. (2013). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının fen içeriği ile ilişkilendirilmiş bilimin doğası konusundaki pedagojik alan bilgilerinin gelişimi (Development of pre-service science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science embedded into science content). Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
48. Pattamapongsa, A, Pongsophon, P., Suwanwong, S. (2016). The development of high school student’s views of nature of science in photosynthesis learning unit using explicit NOS approach, Journal of Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 7(2), 265-284.
49. Porra, A. C., Sales, N. L. L., & Silva, C. C. (2011). Conceptions of nature of science: adaptation of an instrument for application to undergraduate students at public universities in Brazil, Encounter of Research in Education in Sciences, 1-9.
50. Prieto, A. J. (1992). A method for translation of instruments to other languages. Adult Education Quarterly, 43(1), 1-14.
51. Regmi, K., Naidoo, J., & Pilkington, P. (2010). Understanding the processes of translation and transliteration in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(1), 16-26.
52. Roid, G. H., & Haladyna, T. M. (1982). A technology for test-item writing. Academic Press,.
53. Rubba, P. A. (1976). Nature of scientific knowledge scale. School of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 204.
54. Rubba, P. A., & Harkness, W. L. (1993). Examination of preservice and in‐service secondary science teachers' beliefs about science‐technology‐society interactions. Science Education, 77(4), 407-431.
55. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2008). An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: The VOSI questionnaire. Paper presented at the NARST Annual International Conference, Baltimore, MD.
56. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science education, 88(4), 610-645.
57. Spady, D. (2012). Effects of storytelling on students' beliefs and attitudes about the nature of science and doing science, Doctoral dissertation, Montana State University-Bozeman.
58. Temel, S., Şen, Ş., & Özcan, Ö. (2017). The development of the nature of science view scale (NOSvs) at university level. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-14.
59. Thye, T. L. and Kwen, B. H. (2004). Assessing the nature of science views of Singaporean pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 29(2), 1.
60. Todt, H. (2014). Scientific students of the University of Vienna on "nature of science" with a special focus on the aspect atoms, Doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna.
61. Walls, L. (2016). Awakening a dialogue: A critical race theory analysis of US nature of science research from 1967 to 2013. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1546-1570.
62. Wilson, L. L. (1954). A study of opinions related to the nature of science and its purpose in society. Science Education, 38(2), 159-164.
63. Young, N. J. (2011). The effect of explicit instruction on student views of the nature of science and science related attitudes, Doctoral dissertation, California State University, Long Beach.
64. Yuenyong, C., & Thao-Do, T. P. (2015). The outcomes of workshop for introduced view of nature of science to Vietnamese science teachers in Mekong delta region of Vietnam. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 59.