Towards Meaningful Learning through Inquiry
Abstract views: 200
/ 
PDF downloads: 149
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v3i1.188Keywords:
Meaningful Learning, Deep Approach to Learning, Scientific Inquiry, Experimental LearningAbstract
The purpose of this study is to develop and implement a study module including scientific inquiry based experiments in the context of the physical phenomenon of friction, and to assess the learning outcomes. The aim is to describe the levels of students’ understanding after instruction as well as to study where learning is situated on the continuum between meaningful and rote learning. This study is a qualitative case study and the participants of the study are sixth graders from a countryside school. The students studied the issue of friction by doing experiments in collaborative small-groups, following the principles of scientific inquiry. The data was collected firstly, by asking the students prior to the teaching intervention to explain what happens in a picture which shows someone slipping, and secondly, by using an open-ended questionnaire after the teaching intervention. Before instruction, students only used their prior experiences and perceptions in their explanations, whereas after it they also utilized the scientific knowledge and concepts which they had learned during the intervention. After instruction, the students’ answers reflected deeper understanding of the phenomenon, and of the five types of learners found, one type reaches the level of meaningful learning. The finding of five types of learners reflects the complexity of students’ understanding.
References
Abedoe, X.S. (2008). Engaging Students in Inquiry: Tales From an Undergraduate Geology Laboratory-Based Course. Science Education, 92, 631-663.
Asay, L.D. & Orgill, M. (2010). Analysis of Essential Features of Inquiry Found in Articles Published in The Science Teacher, 1998-2007. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 57-79.
Ausubel, D. & Robinson, F.G. (1969). School learning: an introduction to educational psychology. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Brown, P.L., Abell, K.S., Demir, A., & Schmidt, F. (2006). College Science Teachers’ Views of Classroom Inquiry. Science Education, 90, 784-802.
Chin, C. & Brown, D.E. (2000). Learning in Science: A Comparison of Deep and Surface Approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 109-138.
Edmonson, K.M. & Novak, J.D. (1993). The interplay of scientific epistemological views, learning strategies, and attitudes of college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 547-559.
Gomes, A.D.T., Borges, A.T. & Justi, R. (2008). Students´ Performance in Investigative Activity and Their Understanding of Activity Aims. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 109-135.
Gott, R. & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative Work in the Science Curriculum. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Grandy, R.E. & Duschl, R.A. (2005). Reconsidering the Character and Role of Inquiry in School Science: Analysis of a Conference. Paper presented at the International History and Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching Group Meeting in Leeds, England. July 15-18, 2005. Retrieved August 23, 2010, available at www.ruf.rice.edu/~rgrandy/LeedsREGE.pdf
Hofstein, A., Shore, R. & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory: a case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 47-62.
Jones, M.G., Carter, G. & Rua, M.J. (2000). Exploring the development of conceptual ecologies: Communities of concepts related to convection and heat. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 139-159.
Kipnis, M. & Hofstein, A. (2008). The inquiry laboratory as a source for development of metacognitive skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 601-627.
Linn, M.C. & Songer, N.B. (1993). Cognitive and conceptual change in adolescence. In D. Edwards, E. Scanlon, D. West, D. (Eds.), Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Science Education (pp. 139-170). London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
Mintzes, J.J., Wandersee, J.H. & Novak, J.D. (1998). Epilogue: Meaningful Learning, Knowledge Restructuring and Conceptual Change: On Ways of Teaching Science for Understanding. In J.J. Mintzes, J.H. Wandersee, and J.D. Novak, (Eds.) Teaching Science for Understanding. A Human Constructivist View (pp. 327-350). San Diego: Academic Press.
O’Neill, D.K. & Polman, J.L. (2004). Why Educate “Little Scientists?” Examining the Potential of Practical-Based Scientific Literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 234-266.
Pugh, K.J. (2004). Newton’s Laws Beyond the Classroom Walls. Science Education, 88, 182-196.
Sriwattanarothai, N., Jittam, P., Ruenwongsa, P. & Panijpan, B. (2009). From research on local materials to the learning of science: an inquiry-based laboratory for undergraduates. The International Journal of Learning, 10, 459-473.
Tang, X., Coffey, J.E., Elby, A. & Levin, D.M. (2010). The Scientific Method and Scientific Inquiry: Tensions in Teaching and Learning. Science Education, 94, 29-47.
Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: in pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403-418.
Vosniaudou, S. (1997). On the Development of the Understanding of Abstract Ideas. In K. Härnqvist and A. Burgen (Eds.) Growing up with Science. Developing Early Understanding of Science (pp. 41-58). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Wallace, C.S., Tsoi, M.Y., Calkin, J. & Darley, M. (2003). Learning from Inquiry-Based Laboratories in Non Major Biology: An Interpretive Study of the Relationships among Inquiry Experience, Epistemologies, and Conceptual Growth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 986-1024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Authors
