The Effects of Peer Instruction Method on Attitudes of 9th Grade Students towards Physics Course

Authors

Keywords:

Peer Instruction, Attitude Towards Physics, Physics Education

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the effects of peer instruction method on student attitudes towards physics course. In the study, single group pre and posttest quasi- experimental design was adopted. The study was conducted with 46 students registered to 9th grade in a secondary school situated in Ankara province in Turkey in the spring term of 2012-2013 educational year. During 50 class hours “Force and Motion” and “Energy” units were instructed with peer instruction method. “Physics Attitude Scale (PAS)” was utilized as the main data collection tool of the study. PAS is 5-choice Likert type scale with 30 items. The reliability coefficient Cronbach Alpha of the PAS was calculated as 0.963. PAS which, was applied onto the students before and after peer instruction period has 4 factors called; ‘physics course perception’, ‘appreciating the value of physics course’, ‘expectations about physics course’ and ‘hesitations about physics course’. The data obtained with PAS were analyzed with dependent samples t-test. There was statistically significant difference between ‘appreciating the value of physics course’ and ‘expectations about physics course’ factors. This difference may arise from that the peer instruction method encourages students to speak and share ideas among peers more frequently about physics phenomena. As a result of the study the application of peer instruction method was recommended as it facilitates conceptual discussions in abstract concepts of physics.

References

Abak, A. (2003). Modeling the relationship between university students’ selected affective characteristics and their physics achievement. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, The Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

Bennett, J., Lubben, F. & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347-521.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.

Crouch, C.H. & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.

Duit, R., Niedderer, H. & Schecker, H. (2007). Teaching physics. In S.K. Abell, & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 599-629). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Erdemir, N. & Topcu, M.S. (2012). Impact of presentation graphics on preservice science teachers' attitudes towards physics. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(2), 141-152.

Erdemir, N. (2009). Determining students’ attitude towards physics through problem-solving strategy. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 1.

Fagen, A.P., Crouch, C.H. & Mazur, E. (2002). Peer instruction: Results from a range of classrooms. The Physics Teacher, 40(1), 206-209.

Gencel, Đ.E. (2006). Öğrenme stilleri, deneyimsel öğrenme kuramına dayalı eğitim, tutum ve sosyal bilgiler program hedeflerine erisi düzeyi. Yayınlanmamıs Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Đzmir. [in Turkish]

Germann, P.J. (1988). Development of the attitudes toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), 689-703.

Gok, T. (2012). The impact of peer instruction on college students’ beliefs about physics and conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 417-436.

Hırça, N, Çalık, M. & Seven, S. (2011). 5E modeline göre gelistirilen materyallerin öğrencilerin kavramsal değisimine ve fizik dersine karsı tutumlarına etkisi: “Đs, güç ve enerji” ünitesi örneği. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 8(1), 139-152. [in Turkish]

Jacobowitz, T. (1983). Relationship of sex, achievement and science self-concept to the science career preferences of black students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(7), 621-628.

Jones, M.G., Howe, A. & Rua, M.J. (2000). Gender differences in students' experiences, interests and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180-192.

Kaptan, S. (1998). Bilimsel Arastırma ve İstatistik Teknikleri, Tekısık Web Ofset, Ankara.

Keskin, V. (2008). Yapılandırmacı 5E öğrenme modelinin lise öğrencilerinin basit sarkaç kavramları öğrenmelerine ve tutumlarına etkisi, Yayınlanmamıs yüksek lisans tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Đstanbul. [in Turkish]

Koballa, T.R. (1988). Attitude and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72(2), 115-126.

Kocakaya, S. & Gönen, S. (2010). The effects of computer-assisted instruction designed accordıng to 7E model of constructivist learning on physics student teachers‘ achievement, concept learning, self-efficacy perceptions and attitudes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 206-224.

Kocakülah, M.S. & Kocakülah, A. (2006). Öğrencilerin yapılandırmacı öğrenme kuramına dayalı olarak islenen fizik dersine yönelik tutumları, 6th International Educational Technology Conference, 19-21 April, Famagusta, North Cyprus, 1160-1167.

Kroh, L.B. & Thomsen, P.V. (2005). Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: Border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 281-302.

Lasry, N., Mazur, E. & Watkins, J. (2008). Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college. American Journal of Physics, 76(11), 1066-1069.

Mattern, N. & Schau, C. (2002). Gender difference in attitude-achievement relationships over time among white middle-school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 324-340.

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.

MoNE (Ministry of National Education) (2013). Ortaöğretim fizik dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) öğretim programı. Retrieved date 3.1.2013 from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/program2. [in Turkish]

Miller, R.L., Santana-Vega, E. & Terrell, M.S. (2006). Can good questions and peer discussion improve calculus instruction?, PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 16(3), 193-203.

Nasiriyan, A., Azar, H.K., Noruzy, A. & Dalvand, M.R. (2011). A model of self-efficiacy, task value, achievement goals, effort and mathematics achievement. Internetional Journal of Academic Research, 3(2), 612-618.

Nicol, D.J. & Boyle, J.T. (2003). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457-473.

Nuhoğlu, H. & Yalçın, N. (2006). The effectiveness of the learning cycle method to increase students’ achievement in the physics laboratory. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3(2), 28-30.

Oliva, J.M. (2003). The structural coherence of students’ conceptions in mechanics and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 25(5), 539-561.

Oliver, J.S. & Simpson, R.D. (1988). Influences of attitude toward science achievement motivation, and science self-concept on achievement in science: A longitudinal study. Science Education, 72(2), 143-155.

Pesman, H. (2012). Method-approach interaction: The effects of learning cycle vs traditional and contextual vs non-contextual instruction on 11th grade students achievement in and attitudes towards physics. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

Schibeci, R.A. & Riley, J.P. (1986). Influence of students’ background and perceptions on science attitudes and achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 177-187.

Sekercioğlu, A.G. (2011). The effect of peer instruction method on prospective teachers' conceptual understanding and their attitude toward electrostatics. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Balikesir University, Balikesir.

Shringley, R.L., Koballa, T.R. & Simpson, R.D. (1988). Defining attitude for science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), 659-678.

Simpson, R.D. & Oliver, J.S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74(1), 1-18.

Suppapittayaporn, D., Emarat, N. & Arayathanitkul, K. (2010). The effectiveness of peer instruction and structured inquiry on conceptual understanding of force and motion: A case study from Thailand. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(1), 63-79.

Tekiroğlu Doğan, O. (2005). Explainig the relationship between high school students’ selected affective characteristics and their physics achievement. Unpublished Master Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

Thalheimer, W. & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified methodology. Retrieved date 13.01.2014 from http://www.bwgriffin.com/gsu/courses/edur9131/content/Effect_Sizes_pdf5.pdf

Tokgöz, S.S. (2007). The effect of peer instruction on sixth grade students’ science achievement and attitudes. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

Ugurluoglu, M.E. & Walberg, H.J. (1979) Motivation and achievement: A quantitative synthesis. American Educational Research Journal, 16(4), 375-389.

Weingburg, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A metaanalysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387-398.

Yılmaz, Z.A. (2010). Kavramsal değisim metinlerinin üniversite öğrencilerinin geometrik optik konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının düzeltilmesi ve fizik dersine karsı tutumlarına etkisinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamıs Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum. [in Turkish]

Downloads

Published

2014-04-02

How to Cite

Atasoy, S., Ergin, S., & Şen, A. İlhan. (2014). The Effects of Peer Instruction Method on Attitudes of 9th Grade Students towards Physics Course. International Journal of Physics &Amp; Chemistry Education, 6(1), 88–98. Retrieved from https://www.ijpce.org/index.php/IJPCE/article/view/57