Investigation of Questions in Science and Technology Textbooks in terms of Requirements of the Curriculum after Educational Reform in Turkey

Authors

Keywords:

Textbooks, science and technology curriculum, question types, cognitive level

Abstract

In this study, the pupose is to investigate the questions in science and technology textbooks in terms of number of questions per unit in line with unit weight that indicates relative number of questions their cognitive levels and adopted evaluation approaches in the curriculum. In two forth and two fifth grade texbooks, 3474 questions were investigated by using which content analyses method. As a result of the study, differences in distribution of the questions both in one textbook and between the texbooks were detected based on comparing weight of unit and weight of corresponding question number within that unit. It was found that numbers of the questions on input and processing skills as cognitive level determinants was more than number of output skill questions and over the half of the questions were located at in-text position.

References

AAAS. (American Association for the Advancement of Science) (2001). Designs for science literacy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, R.C. (1972). How to construct achievement tests to assess comprehension. Review of Research in Education, 42(2), 145-170.

Anderson, R.S. (1998). Why talk about different ways to grade? The shift from traditional assessment to alternative assessment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 5-16.

Armbruster, B. & Ostertag, J. (1993). Questions in elementary science and social studies textbooks. In B.K. Britton, A. Woodward & M. Binkley (Eds.), Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice, (pp. 69-93), Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publ.

Ayas, A., Çepni, S., Johnson, D. & Turgut, M.F. (1997). Kimya öğretimi [Teaching Chemistry]. YOK/World Bank National Education Devolepment Project, Bilkent, Ankara.

Berberoğlu, G. & Kalender, İ. (2005). Öğrenci başarılarının yıllara, okul türlerine, bölgelere göre incelenmesi: ÖSS ve PISA analizi, [Investigation of student achievement across years, school types and regions: The SSE and PISA analyses]. Journal of Educational Sciences and Practice, 4(7), 21-35.

Berberoğlu, G., Kaptan, F. & Kutlu, Ö. (2002). Türkiye genelinde sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin fen bilgisi dersindeki üst düzey zihinsel becerilerinin incelenmesi. [Investigation of higher order cognitive abilities of eighth graders on science content: Turkish case]. Fifth National Science and Math Education Congress, Middle East Technical University, September 16-18, Ankara, Turkey.

Bloom, B.S. (Ed.), Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H. & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

Brill, G. & Yarden, A. (2003). Learning biology through research papers: A stimulus for question-asking by high-school students. Cell Biology Education, 1(2), 266-274.

Colburn, A. (2000). Constructivism: Science education's grand unifying theory. The Clearing House, 74(1), 9-12.

Costa, A.L. (1985). Teacher behaviors that enable student thinking. In A.L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking, (pp. 125-137), Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Dávila, K. & Talanquer, V. (2010). Classifying end-of-chapter questions and problems for selected general chemistry textbooks used in the United States. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(1), 97-101.

Erdoğan, M. (2007). An analysis of a newly developed fourth and fifth grade science and technology course curriculum: A qualitative study. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 5(2), 221-254.

Gall, M.D. (1970). The use of questions in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 40(5), 707-721.

Gelbal, S. & Kelecioglu, H. (2007). Öğretmenlerin ölçme ve değerlendirme yöntemleri hakkındaki yeterlik algıları ve karşılaştıkları sorunlar [Teachers’ proficiency perceptions of about the measurement and evaluation techniques and the problems they confront]. Hacettepe University, Journal of Education Faculty, 33, 135-145.

Gür, B.S., Çelik, Z. & Özoğlu, M. (2012): Policy options for Turkey: A critique of the interpretation and utilization of PISA results in Turkey. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 1-21.

Haladyna, T.M. (1992). The Effectiveness of several multiple-choice formats. Applied Measurement in Education, 5(1), 73-88.

Haladyna, T.M. (2004). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. (3th ed.), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Jupp, V. (Ed.). (2006). The Sage dictionary of social research methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Kahveci, A. (2010). Quantitative analysis of science and chemistry textbooks for indicators of reform: A complementary perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1495-1519.

Krippendorff, K. (2003) Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. (2th ed.), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication, Inc.

Meyer, L.A., Crummey, L. & Greer, E.A. (1988). Elementary science textbooks: Their contents, text characteristics, and comprehensibility. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 435-463.

MoNE (Ministry of National Education). (2005). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (4. ve 5. sınıflar) öğretim programı. Retrieved February 19, 2013, from’ http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr. index1024.htm. (in Turkish)

MoNE (Ministry of National Education). (2007). ÖBBS raporu: İlköğretim öğrencilerinin başarılarının belirlenmesi Türkçe raporu. Turkish Ministry of Education Education Research and Development Department, Ankara. Retrieved February 02, 2013, from’ http://earged.meb.gov.tr. (in Turkish)

Newport, J.F. (1965). An evaluation of selected series of elementary school science textbooks. Science Education, 49(5), 479-484.

NRC (National Research Council). (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Oakes, J. & Saunders, M. (2004). Education’s most basic tools: Access to textbooks and instructional materials in California’s public schools. Teachers College Record, 106(10), 1967-1988.

Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2007). To what degree do the currently used physics textbooks meet the expectations? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(4), 599-628.

O’Sullivan, M. (2006). Lesson observation and quality in primary education as contextual teaching and learning processes. International Journal of Educational Development, 26, 246-260.

Pizzini, E.L., Shepardson, D.P. & Abell, S.K. (1992). The questioning level of select middle school science textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 92, 74-79.

Popham, W.J. (2003). Test better, teach better: The instructional role of assessment. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Radcliffe, R., Caverly, D., Hand, J. & Franke, D. (2008). Improving reading in a middle school science classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51(5), 398-408.

Rourke, L. & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5-18.

Şahin, İ. (2008). The evaluation of new science and technology curriculum for grades 4 to 5. Milli Eğitim Dergisi (The Journal of National Education), 177, 181-207.

Shepardson, D.P. & Pizzini, E.L. (1991). Questioning levels of junior high school science textbooks and their implications for learning textual information. Science Education, 75, 673-682.

Stake, R.E. & Easley, J.A. (1978). Case studies in science education. Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation, Urbana: University of Illinois.

Stern, L. & Ahlgren, A. (2002). Analysis of students’ assessments in middle school curriculum materials: Aiming precisely at benchmarks and standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 889-910.

Tavşancıl, E. & Aslan, E. (2001). Sözel, yazılı ve diğer materyaller için içerik analizi ve uygulama örnekleri [Content analysis of verbal, written and other materials and application examples]. Istanbul: Epsilon Publishing.

Wang, H.A. (1998). Science textbook studies reanalysis: Teachers “friendly” content analysis methods. Paper presented the Annual Meeting of NARST, 71st, April 19-22, San Diego, CA, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED423142).

Yager, R.E. (1996). Science/technology/society as a reform in science education. New York: State University Press.

Yılmaz, A., Seçken, N. & Morgil, İ. (1998). Lise 11. sınıf, kimya 3 ders kitaplarının kimya eğitimine uygunluklarının araştırılması. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 14, 73-83. (in Turkish)

Downloads

Published

10/10/2013

How to Cite

Yaman, S. (2013). Investigation of Questions in Science and Technology Textbooks in terms of Requirements of the Curriculum after Educational Reform in Turkey. International Journal of Physics &Amp; Chemistry Education, 5(2), 164–175. Retrieved from https://www.ijpce.org/index.php/IJPCE/article/view/81