Investigation of Student-Centered Teaching Applications of Physics Student Teachers
Abstract views: 428
/ 
PDF downloads: 270
Keywords:
Computer-Assisted Teaching, Context-Based Instruction, Physics Student Teachers, REACT, Student-Centered TeachingAbstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of teaching materials in physics, based on Context-Based Instruction, REACT [Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating, and Transferring] and Computer-Assisted Teaching methods, on the academic success, interests and attitudes of student teachers. This study was conducted with 159 ninth and tenth graders in three different Anatolian high schools in Trabzon that were chosen as field sites in the Spring semester in the context of Faculty-School Partnership. The results of the pre-and posttest that were applied to a single group were compared, and the effects of Computer-Assisted Teaching, REACT and Context-Based Instruction on the attitudes, interests and academic success of the students toward physics were considered. Based on the findings, it was concluded that REACT, the Content-Based Approach, and Computer-Assisted Learning Method were effective in increasing the student success, interest and positive attitude.
References
Azar, A. & Çepni, S. (1999). Fizik öğretmenlerinin kullandıkları öğretim etkinliklerinin mesleki deneyime göre değişimi (Variation of teaching activities used by physics teachers according to professional experience). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16/17, 24-33.
Bedwell, E.L., Hunt, H.G., Touzel, J.T. & Wisaman, G.D. (1991). Effective teaching, preparation and implementation, Illinois, U.S.A.
Bencze, L. & Hodson, D. (1999). Changing practice by changing practice: toward more authentic science and science curriculum development, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 521-539.
Hall, J. & Saunders, P. (1997). Adopting a student-centred approach to management of learning. In C. Bell, M. Bowden, & A. Trott (Eds.), Implementing Flexible Learning. London: Kogan Page.
Hamilton, M.L. (Ed.). (1998). Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education. London: Falmer Press.
Hodson, D. & Bencze, L. (1998). Becoming critical about practicalwork: Changing views changing practice through action research. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 683-694.
Kavcar, C. (1999). Nitelikli öğretmen sorunu (The issue of competent teachers). D.E.Ü. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11,1-13.
Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction. 7(3), 255–275.
Kember, D. (2009). Promoting student-centred forms of learning across an entire university. Higher Education, 58(1), 1-13.
Kete, R., Özdemir, A. & Ok, G. (1998). İlköğretim okullarının fen bilgisi öğretimi sorunları (Science education problems of primary schools). III. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyum, Bildiriler kitabı, 353-359.
Kocaküllah, M.S. & Kocaküllah, A. (2001). İlköğretim fen eğitiminde yapılan deneysel çalışmalar ile ilgili öğretmen görüşleri (Teachers' views on experimental studies in primary science education). Yeni Binyılın Başında Türkiyede Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu, Bildiriler kitabı, 100-107.
Lea, S.J., Stephenson, D. & Troy, J. (2003). Higher Education Students’ Attitudes to Student Centred Learning: Beyond ‘educational bulimia’. Studies in Higher Education. 28(3), 321-334.
Loughran, J., Hamilton, M. L., LaBoskey, V. K., & Russell, T. L. (Eds.). (2004). International handbook of self-study on teaching and teacher education (vol. 12). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Moore, J.J. & Watson, S.B. (1999). Contributors to the decision of elementary student teachers towards science and science teaching. Science Education, 65, 157-177.
Pinnegar, S. (1995). (Re-)Experiencing beginning. Teaching Education Quarterly, 22(3), 65-83.
Prosser, K. & Trigwell, M. (2002). Experiences of teaching in Higher Education. In Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience of Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Rice, D. & Roychoudhury, A. (2003). Preparing more confident preservice elementary science teachers: One elementary science methods teacher’s self-study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14, 97-126.
Saka A.Z. (2004a). Fen öğretiminde kullanılan somutlaştırma araçları ve uygulanma düzeyleri (Concrete tools used in science education and their implementation levels). VI. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Bildiriler kitabı, 73-78.
Saka A.Z. (2004b). Improving professional skills of practitioners by constructing an effective approach in science teaching. The Turkısh Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(4), 28-37.
Saka A.Z. (2005). A different approach to have student teachers gain varied methods in teaching, The Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 5(19), 251-262.
Springer, L., Stanne, M.E. & Donnovan, S.S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21-51.
Trumbul, D.J. & Kerr, P. (1993). University reseachers’ inchoate critiques of science teaching: Implications for the content of preservice science teacher education. Science Education, 77(3), 301-317.
Uzuntiryaki, E. & Geban, Ö. (1998). Kavramsal değişim yaklaşımının öğrencilerin çözeltileri anlamalarına etkisi (The effect of conceptual change approach on students' understanding of solutions). Eğitim 97-98, TED Ankara Koleji, Ankara, 1(1), 51-56.
van Zee, E., Lay, D. & Roberts, D. (2003). Fostering collaborative inquiries by prospective and practicing elementary and middle school teachers. Science Education, 87, 588–612.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (Qualitative research methods in the social sciences). Seçkin Yayıncılık 5. Baskı, Ankara.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Authors
