Students’ Perceptions of Learning Effiency of Introductory Physics Course


Abstract views: 266 / PDF downloads: 200

Authors

Keywords:

Everyday Physics, Learning Efficiency, Post-Then-Pre Method, Self-Assessment, Students’ Perception

Abstract

The aim of this study was by using students’ self-assessments to identify the learning efficiency of introductory (mechanics and waves) physics course connecting physics to students’ everyday life. Physics is one of the most difficult courses for students, mainly because its presentation is theoretical, mathematical and abstract without everyday applications and examples. Moreover, connections to students’ everyday life are crucial for learner’s mental construction of the information they learn and for achieving meaningful learning. The findings of this study are significant in evaluating the learning efficiency of the physics course, which was presented by connection to students’ everyday life. The sample consisted of a total of 92 first year undergraduates, 82 of which were male and 10 were female. Data was collected by a likert type scale which was prepared in line with the post-then-pre test method called “Students’ Perceptions of Learning – Students’ Self-Assessment” developed by the Author. Hake’s formula was used in order to calculate learning efficiency. The findings of this study indicated that learning efficiencies were high for the areas in which students were interested in everyday life. Moreover, that learning efficiencies were higher for topics students had learnt before in comparison to new ones. Mean that learning efficiency of the lesson was calculated as 0.5, which was between 0.3 and 0.7, and thus indicated moderate learning efficiency.

References

Andrée, M. (2003). Everyday-Life in the Science Classroom: A Study on Ways of Using and Referring to Everyday-Life. Paper presented at the ESERA Conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.

Avison, J. (2005). The Hutchinson Pocket Dictionary of Physics, Helicon Publishing.

Ayas A., Karamustafaoğlu O., Sevim S. & Karamustafaoğlu S. (2001). Fen Bilgisi Öğrencilerinin Bilgilerini Günlük Yaşamla İlişkilendirebilme Seviyeleri. Yeni Bin Yılın Başında Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu Proceedings Book. Maltepe University, Istanbul, 458-462.

Aycan, Ş. & Yumuşak, A. (2002). Lise Fizik Müfredatındaki Konuların Anlaşılma Düzeyleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Paper presented at the V. Science and Mathematics Educational Conference, ODTÜ, Ankara, p96. Retrieved April 24, 2010, from http://www.fedu.metu.edu.tr/ufbmek-5/b_kitabi/PDF/Fizik/Poster/t96d.pdf.

Baran, Ş., Doğan, S. & Yalçın, M. (2002). Üniversite Biyoloji Öğrencilerinin Öğrenimleri Sırasında Edindikleri Bilgileri Günlük Hayatla İlişkilendirebilme Düzeyleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 89-96.

Capizzo, M.C., Nuzzo, S. & Zarcone, M. (2006). The Impact of the Pre-instructional Cognitive Profile on Learning Gain and Final Exam of Physics Courses: A Case Study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 717-727.

Chu, H., Treagust, D.F. & Chandrasegaran, A.L. (2008). Naïve Students’ Conceptual Development and Beliefs: The Need for Multiple Analyses to Determine what Contributes to Student Success in a University Introductory Physics Course. Research in Science Education, 38, 111-125.

Coştu, B., Unal, S. & Ayas, A. (2007). Günlük Yaşamdaki Olayların Fen Bilimleri Öğretiminde Kullanılması, Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 197-207.

Çepni, S., Ayas, A., Johnson, D., & Turgut, M.F. (1997). Fizik Öğretimi. YÖK/Dünya Bankası MEGP Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen Eğitimi Publishing, Bilkent, Ankara.

Deeson, E. (2007), Internet-linked Dictionary of Physics, Collins Press.

Hake, R.R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores, Retrieved May 13, 2010, from http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf.

Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, American Journal of Physics, 66, 64- 74.

Hammer, D., (1994). Epistemological Beliefs in Introductory Physics, Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 151-183.

Hewitt, P. (2004). The Three Stages of Learning, Physics World, 17(9), 16-17.

Howard, G.S. (1980). Response-shift bias a problem in evaluating interventions with pre/post self-reports, Evaluation Review, 4(1), 93-106.

Karaman, I. (2005). Erzurum İlinde Bulunan Liselerdeki Fizik Sınav Sorularının Bloom Taksonomisinin Basamaklarına Göre Analizi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 77-90.

Köseoğlu, F. & Kavak, N. (2001). Fen Öğretiminde Yapılandırıcı Yaklaşım. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 139-148.

Lindenfeld, P. (2002). Guest Comment: Format and Content in Introductory Physics. American Journal of Physics, 70, 12-13.

Meltzer, D.E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible 'hidden variable' in diagnostic pre-test scores. American Journal of Physics, 70, 1259-1268.

Olina, Z. & Sullivan, H.J. (2004). Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance, Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(3), 5-22.

Ornek, F., Robinson, W.R. & Haugan, M.P. (2008). What Makes Physics Difficult? International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(1), 30-34.

Ozmen, H. (2004). Fen Öğretiminde Öğrenme Teorileri ve Teknoloji Destekli Yapılandırmacı (Constructivist) Öğrenme, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1), Article 14, Retrieved May 13, 2010, from http://www.tojet.net/articles/3114.pdf.

Pritchard, D.E., Barrantes, A. & Belland, B.R. (2009). What Else (Besides the Syllabus) Should Students Learn in Introductory Physics?, Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, Retrieved May 13, 2010, from http://relate.mit.edu/papers/What2TeachPERC09.pdf.

Prosser, M., Wlaker, P. & Millar, R. (1996). Differences in Students' Perceptions of Learning Physics. Physics Education, 31, 43-48.

Redish, E.F., Saul, J.M., & Steinberg, R.N. (1998). Student Expectations in Introductory Physics. American Journal of Physics, 66, 212-224.

Rockwell, S.K., & Kohn, H. (1989). Post-Then-Pre Evaluation: Measuring behavior change more accurately. Journal of Extension, 27(2): Retrieved May 13, 2010, from http://www.joe.org/joe/1989summer/a5.html.

Romer, R.H. (1993). Reading the Equations and Confronting the Phenomena – The Delights and Dilemmas of Physics Teaching. American Journal of Physics, 61, 128-142.

Sahin, M. (2010). Effects of Problem-Based Learning on University Students’ Epistemological Beliefs About Physics and Physics Learning and Conceptual Understanding of Newtonian Mechanics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(3), 266-275.

Trumper, R., (2006). Factors Affecting Junior High School Students’ Interest in Physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 47-58.

Whiteleggy, E. & Parry, M., (1999). Real-life Contexts for Learning Physics: Meanings, Issues and Practice. Physics Education, 34(2),68-72.

Yiğit N., Devecioğlu, Y. & Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2002). İlköğretim fen bilgisi öğrencilerinin Fen kavramlarını günlük yaşamdaki olgu ve olaylarla ilişkilendirme Düzeyleri, Paper presented at the V. Science and Mathematics Educational Conference, ODTU, Ankara, p94. Retrieved April 24, 2010, from http://www.fedu.metu.edu.tr/ufbmek-5/b_kitabi/PDF/Fen/Bildiri/t94d.pdf.

Downloads

Published

01/18/2011

How to Cite

Süzük, E., Çorlu, M. A., & Gürel, C. (2011). Students’ Perceptions of Learning Effiency of Introductory Physics Course. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(SI), 65–71. Retrieved from https://www.ijpce.org/index.php/IJPCE/article/view/124